| Municipal Sewage Sludge/BioSolids |
|
|
Environmental
Energy Company's technology enables municipal treatment facilities
to significantly increase their solids processing capacity while
at the same time improving the quality and efficiency of their operations.
Our technology for improving municipal treatment is
based on the patented AGF Process.
This basic process has been improved through its application on
a number of projects. Improvements address: removal of inorganic
sands and silts; gas cleaning for efficient reuse; and CO2
sequestering for controlling scale (struvite) formation. We have
also developed the "Simply Class A" Process which is the
most economical and energy efficient process for producing a Class
A product. Patents are pending on each of these improvements.
The AGF process has been assessed by a variety of
organizations involved in municipal treatment. The Water Environment
Federation described it in its "Biosolids Management: Assessment
of Innovative Processes." The Seattle regional sewage treatment
provider, King County Metro, performed an extensive study of alternative
wastewater practices. They concluded: "..the AGF process
can attain similar or greater solids destruction than conventional
digestion systems with one-half to one-third the digester volume.
Certainly the greatest benefit to King County is the potential to
increase the capacity of the existing digesters by two to three
times. The additional benefit of more gas production and less biosolids
to dewater, haul and apply make this an even more attractive technology."
See the excerpted pages in PDF of King
County's assessment
We have prepared a example economic analysis in which
we show the AGF Benefits based on soley operational savings. This
is available as a PDF document, AGF Economic
Benefits Deriving from Energy Production and Solids Disposal Reduction
|
|
After having designed, built, and monitored the AGF
for full scale facilities, the following has been observed about
the process:
|
|
its economic benefits will pay for any capital
costs in less than two years. |
| it expands the capacity
of digesters by 2 to 3 times their current capacity. |
| it uses
less energy than that required to mix a single digester. |
| it substantially improves
the volatile solids destruction by converting 70% to 80% of the solids
to gas as compared to 40% for aerobic digestion and 50% to 60% for
conventional and thermophilic digestion. |
| it produces a Class A pasteurized
product which is not restricted in its use by the public. |
| unlike other Class
A processes, it consumes no additional energy than required to heat
a conventional digester. |
| it produces an odorless
product, unlike othe digestion and stabilization processes. |
| it does not require
extensive sludge pre-thickening. A more dilute raw sludge can be fed
to the digester. |
| it reduces the time
to dewater solids by a factor of 4 to 5 the time to dewater using
conventional belt presses. Hence, the capacity of existing dewatering
facilities is substantially improved and the allocation of staff to
that operation is reduced. |
| it eliminates the need
to store biosolids, since more sludge can be stored in the digesters
by increasing the solids concentration. |
| it eliminates foaming. |
| it eliminates struvite scaling. |
| it produces a high
quality gas containing 75% to 80% methane and little sulfide. |
| it produces a high quality
effluent from which nitrogen and phosphorus can be recovered much
more economically than other processes. |